2024, Vol. 4, Issue 2, Part C
Building bridges: Harmonizing forensic practices and legal standards for effective justice delivery
Author(s): Sonali and Sonia Saxena
Abstract: The integration of forensic science and legal frameworks is critical for enhancing the accuracy, efficiency, and equity of the criminal justice system. This paper explores the interplay between these disciplines, focusing on their combined role in solving crimes, securing convictions, and ensuring fairness in judicial outcomes. It examines the evolution of forensic science, highlighting its technological advancements such as DNA profiling, digital forensics, and artificial intelligence, which have revolutionized evidence analysis. Concurrently, the paper evaluates the legal principles and frameworks that govern the admissibility, reliability, and ethical application of forensic evidence in court. A critical analysis identifies existing gaps, including inconsistencies in standards, judicial knowledge deficits, and systemic biases, which often undermine the effectiveness of this integration. Case studies demonstrate real-world implications, illustrating both successes and failures in aligning forensic practices with legal requirements. Future directions are explored, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration, international harmonization of standards, and proactive policy reforms to address ethical and privacy concerns. By bridging these gaps, the criminal justice system can leverage forensic science to uphold justice, protect individual rights, and maintain public trust. This paper underscores the imperative of a dynamic and equitable approach to integrating forensic science and legal frameworks, offering actionable recommendations for a future-ready criminal justice paradigm.
DOI: 10.22271/27899497.2024.v4.i2c.105Pages: 188-195 | Views: 98 | Downloads: 54Download Full Article: Click Here
How to cite this article:
Sonali, Sonia Saxena.
Building bridges: Harmonizing forensic practices and legal standards for effective justice delivery. Int J Criminal Common Statutory Law 2024;4(2):188-195. DOI:
10.22271/27899497.2024.v4.i2c.105